I think Tom Hiddleston is mucho attractive, but if anything perhaps more Louis-like in that he is tall and slender with legs that go on for several miles at least. His face is too English-looking for either of them, though.
The thing about TH is that he becomes attractive after you've seen him in motion, in a role or even just being his very charming and amusing self in interviews. TH as Loki certainly carries the snarktastic, OMG-you-PEASANT air that would suggest Lestat. The first time I saw a pic of him I wasn't much impressed either.
*ahem* Okay, stepping off the TH soapbox now.
As far as these very amusing Lestat Tells His Family etc. I like the Bradley Cooper as Augustin one, but I find anything in Rage Comic form hilarious in the extreme. Several million points for that version!
Re: in defense of Tom Hiddleston as Lestat
Date: 2014-02-15 03:55 pm (UTC)The thing about TH is that he becomes attractive after you've seen him in motion, in a role or even just being his very charming and amusing self in interviews. TH as Loki certainly carries the snarktastic, OMG-you-PEASANT air that would suggest Lestat. The first time I saw a pic of him I wasn't much impressed either.
*ahem* Okay, stepping off the TH soapbox now.
As far as these very amusing Lestat Tells His Family etc. I like the Bradley Cooper as Augustin one, but I find anything in Rage Comic form hilarious in the extreme. Several million points for that version!